|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：Apparently, a purely operational way of looking at mathematics would be quite appropriate. Indeed, to an unprejudiced and insightful person, the very notion of "mathematical object" may appear superfluous: since processes seem to be the only real concern of mathematics, why bother about these elusive, philosophically p是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
Apparently, a purely operational way of looking at mathematics would be quite appropriate. Indeed, to an unprejudiced and insightful person, the very notion of "mathematical object" may appear superfluous: since processes seem to be the only real concern of mathematics, why bother about these elusive, philosophically p
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
顯然,一個純粹是可行的方法來看數學會是很適當。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
很顯然，看一看數學的純粹是出於作業方式是相當適當的。事實上，給無偏見和最有見解的人，"數學物件"的說法可能會出現多餘的： 由於進程似乎是唯一真正關切的數學問題，為什麼費心這些難以捉摸的哲學問題"東西"，如無限集或"的有序對聚合"嗎？從理論上是可能純粹運作上做數學幾乎所有的： 我們可著手從基本流程進行更高級別的進程，然後到更複雜的進程無過指的任何種類的抽象物件
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
