|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：The problem description is inaccurate. It did not explain why you miss the WINGS order. The problem from the IBM's perspective is ... ATT3 had 3 DIBs and only require one tester to test the WIP and should be in an excellent fail proof situation. Think along this line and figure out what had went wrong where all 3 DIBs 是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
The problem description is inaccurate. It did not explain why you miss the WINGS order. The problem from the IBM's perspective is ... ATT3 had 3 DIBs and only require one tester to test the WIP and should be in an excellent fail proof situation. Think along this line and figure out what had went wrong where all 3 DIBs
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
這一問題說明是不正確的。 它並沒有解釋為什麼您錯過了翅膀秩序。 這一問題來自於ibm的角度來看是...... att3已3底比斯和隻需要一個測試,測試出,應在一個很好的証明失敗情況。 認為沿著這條線和圖出了什麼錯在那裡所有3底比斯落井下石。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
问题描述是不准确的。没有解释你想为什么翅膀安排。从 IBM 的远景的问题是 ...ATT3 有 3 DIBs 和仅要求一位测试人测试 WIP 和应该是在优秀没通过证据处境。沿着这条线想和想出有的出问题哪里所有 3 DIBs 是情绪低落的。
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
