求翻译：有的语言学家，如王力（1944）和夸克等（1985），将照应也归入到替代的范畴。而在韩礼德和哈桑（1976）的语篇衔接系统中， 替代和照应分别属于两种不同的语法衔接手段。它们的区别表现在：首先，替代是一种词汇语法关系，而照应是一种语义关系。也就是说，在语言系统中，替代是建立在词汇语法层上的，而照应则是建立在语义层上的。在照应关系中，指代成分和所指对象之间存在着语义上的一致性或认同性， 即受话者可以从上下文中索引指代成分的所指意义。是什么意思？

Some linguists, such as Wang Li (1944) and Quark (1985), will take care of also be deemed to alternative areas. Halliday and Hasan (1976) The Cohesive system, alternative and take care of belonging to two different grammatical cohesive devices. The difference between them: First of all, the alternat

There is a linguist, such as Wang (1944) and Quark (1985), will serve as a substitute. While in Korea (Halliday and Hasan) of the 1976 language article interface system, alternative, and care are two different syntax interface. The difference between them in the form of: First of all, alternative is

Some linguist, like the king strength (1944) and the quark and so on (1985), will take care of also belongs to the substitution category.But in Han Lide and in the Hasan (1976) language engagement system, substitutes and takes care of separately belongs to two different grammar engagement method.The

Some linguists, such as Wang Li (1944) and quarks (1985), will care also subsumed into alternative areas. While in Halliday and Hasan (1976) cohesive system, alternative and care to belong to two different grammatical cohesion instruments. Their difference is expressed in: first, the alternative is

正在翻译，请等待...