|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：If both Q and S are correlated with v, then a classifier based on both Q and S may have higher accuracy than one that considers only Q, only S, or neither. Our results show that sanitization which removes the correlation between S and Q also destroys the correlation between S and v.是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
If both Q and S are correlated with v, then a classifier based on both Q and S may have higher accuracy than one that considers only Q, only S, or neither. Our results show that sanitization which removes the correlation between S and Q also destroys the correlation between S and v.
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
如果Q和S关联与v，则量词根据两Q并且S比考虑仅Q的一个，仅S也许有高精确度，或者两者都不。我们的结果显示那清扫干净哪些去除S和Q之间的交互作用也毁坏S和v.之间的交互作用。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
如果Q和S关联以v，则量词根据两Q 并且S比考虑仅Q的一个，仅S也许有高准确性， 或两者都不。 我们的结果显示那清扫干净哪些去除 S和Q之间的交互作用也毁坏S和v.之间的交互作用。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
如果 Q 和 S 相关使用 v，然后基于 Q 和 S 分类器可能有更高的精度比一个认为只有 Q，只有 S，或既不。我们的研究结果显示，净化这将删除 S 和 Q 的相关性也毁坏 S 和 v 之间的相互关系。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
