|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：As discussed above, the UBIT does not fit well with its traditional explanations. Unfair competition does not logically explain the distinctions between active and passive or related and unrelated income. Moreover, the complete absence of complaining taxpayers seems to undermine the idea that Congress was galvanized in是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
As discussed above, the UBIT does not fit well with its traditional explanations. Unfair competition does not logically explain the distinctions between active and passive or related and unrelated income. Moreover, the complete absence of complaining taxpayers seems to undermine the idea that Congress was galvanized in
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
如上面所讨论的， UBIT不与传统的解释合身。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
如上所述， UBIT不很好符合它的传统解释。 不公平竞争不逻辑上解释激活和被动或相关和无关的收入之间的分别。 而且，抱怨的纳税人完全缺席似乎破坏想法国会被镀锌入行动保卫他们反对慈善的劫掠。 收支解释平展也下跌，没有，因为反租和引导交易没有造成重大威胁收支，但是，因为政府决策人员一贯地想念避免税的可征税的人通过这些交易并且集中他们的怒火于“恶习”由慈善便利。 终于，理论国会简单地变疯狂并且开始追逐，在税虚构物是分析的不令人满意的放弃王位之后。 清楚地，国会在某事以后追逐除它的陈述的猎物之外，但驾驶它的这具体疯狂带有分析和诊断。 这部分将试图那个分析和诊断。 点不是重建未曾发生的合理的政策分析，但
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
