当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:Professor Tong notes that, despite the foundational and ideological legitimacy, within Marxist and Leninist principles, of constitutional government in China, there has been an intellectual reaction against constitutional government in China (Ibid., p.3). Professor Tong notes correctly that from 2004 this reactionary l是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
Professor Tong notes that, despite the foundational and ideological legitimacy, within Marxist and Leninist principles, of constitutional government in China, there has been an intellectual reaction against constitutional government in China (Ibid., p.3). Professor Tong notes correctly that from 2004 this reactionary l
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
唐教授指出,尽管基础和意识形态的合法性,在马克思列宁主义和原则,宪政在中国,出现了反对宪政在中国(同上,第3页)一个知识分子的反应。
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
Tong教授注意到,尽管基本原理和思想合法,在马克思主义和列宁主义的原则的宪政内在中国,有智力反应反对宪政在中国(Ibid., p.3)。Tong教授恰当地注意从2004年这反动文学在中国寻求确实地绘宪政作为与一点共鸣的西部修建到条件。
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
tong教授注意到,尽管基本原理和思想合法,在马克思主义和列宁主义的原则的宪政之内在中国,有智力反应反对宪政在中国 (Ibid., p.3)。 Professor Tong notes correctly that from 2004 this reactionary literature sought to paint constitutional government strictly as a western construct with little resonance to the conditions in China. More telling, that literature
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
正在翻译,请等待...
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译,请等待...
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭