|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：Others believe that full-scale LFT is unreasonably expensive and impractical only for some aircraft, such as large nontactical aircraft that are not likely to encounter threats to their survival, and is not unreasonably expensive and impractical for other aircraft, such as small tactical aircraft that are very likely t是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
Others believe that full-scale LFT is unreasonably expensive and impractical only for some aircraft, such as large nontactical aircraft that are not likely to encounter threats to their survival, and is not unreasonably expensive and impractical for other aircraft, such as small tactical aircraft that are very likely t
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
其他相信全方位LFT为一些航空器是不合情理地昂贵和仅不切实际的，例如不可能遇到威胁到他们的生存的大nontactical航空器，并且为其他航空器不是不合情理地昂贵和不切实际的，例如是非常可能遇到威胁到他们的生存的小战斗机; 有认为的一些LFT为任何航空器不是不合情理地昂贵和不切实际的。 他们通过测试全方位仅相信那，某些设计弱点被发现的充分的航空器罐头，它从未太晚以至于不能改变设计，如果它是不充分的，测验时间表可以被设计，以便全方位目标不是在危险中为所有射击和所有其他好处与测试被提出的inChapter 2的活火相关。 所有这些观点和信仰在篱芭的两边是主观的; 什么都不是客观的。 好处和风险的量
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
