求翻译：また丸山の理論的立場は、マルクス主義の側からは「近代主義」と呼ばれる市民社会論的なものであったが、「明治以来の絶対主義的一寡頭的体制がそのままファシズム体制へと移行しえた」とする占一では、丸山と「講座派」マルクス主義の歴史像は親和的・相互補完的な関係にあった。是什么意思？

The theoretical position of Maruyama , but from the side of Marxism was what civil society theory called " modernism " , " since the Meiji absolutist one oligarchs regime was E shifted to as fascism system

正在翻译，请等待...

In addition the theoretical standpoint of Maruyama was civil society theory ones which are called “modern principle” from side of Marxism, but “despotism one oligarchy system ever since Meiji could move to fascism system that way”, that with the occupying one which is done, Maruyama and as for the h

Also Maruyama's theoretical position that global civil society are called "modernism" from the side of the Marxism which was "absolutism of the Meiji era was shifted to fascist regime as an oligarchic regime" and a dominant one, Maruyama and history of "courses" Marxism was harmonized and mutually b

正在翻译，请等待...