求翻译：排在第七， “were”排在第38位，出现过658次，而它的原形“is”排在42，只出现了581次，而“are”在前五十里面没有出现过，排在了71位，只出现了366次。助动词“had”出现了1622第16位，情态动词“could”出现了494次第46位，这就说明，作者在这部中是用过去式来叙述的发展情节的。是什么意思？

Came in seventh , "were" at No. 38 , there have been 658 times, and its prototype "is" ranked at 42 , with only 581 times, and "are" there has never been inside the top 50 , ranked in the

In the first 7, "were" in the first 38-bit, there have been 658 times, and the prototype "is" in 42, with only a 581 times, and the "are" in the first 50 there has not been a in 71 bit, with only 366 times. For the verb "had" appears in 1622 the first 16-bit, and state the word "could" is the 494, t

Arranges in seventh, “were” arranges at 38th, has appeared 658 times, but its primary form “is” arranges at 42, only appeared 581 times, but “are” has not appeared inside first 50, arranged in 71, only appeared 366 times.The auxiliary verb “had” appeared 1622 16th, the modal verb “could” appeared 49

Ranked seven, "were" ranked in 38th place, there were 658, while its prototype "is" ranked 42, only 581 times, and "are" does not appear in the top 50, ranked 71, only 366 times. The auxiliary verbs "had" there have been 1622 16th modals "could" there were 494 46th, which means, in this novel, the a

正在翻译，请等待...