|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：Claimants assert that “rights in rem” are not a prerequisite to an expropriation claim and rely on several arbitral decisions to conclude that “they may also extend to contractual rights.”They further submit that an “indirect expropriation may also be caused by a violation of non-contractual rights.”是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
Claimants assert that “rights in rem” are not a prerequisite to an expropriation claim and rely on several arbitral decisions to conclude that “they may also extend to contractual rights.”They further submit that an “indirect expropriation may also be caused by a violation of non-contractual rights.”
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
索赔人说， “物权”是不是一个先决条件征用索赔和依靠几个仲裁裁决得出结论， “他们也可能延伸到合同权利。 ”他们还提出了一个“间接征收，也可以由违规造成的
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
索赔人说,"物权"是一个先决条件不没收的索赔,都依赖于几个仲裁决定,得出结论说,"他们可能还将延伸到合同规定的权利."他们进一步提出,“间接征收也可能会导致一个违规的非合同权利”。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
请诉人断言“权利在REM”不是一个前提到征用土地要求并且依靠几个仲裁决定认为， “他们也许也延伸到契约右边。”他们进一步递交“间接征用土地也许由侵害非契约权利也造成”。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
索赔人说"物权"征用索赔的先决条件并不依赖于几个仲裁裁决以结束"他们可能还延伸到合同的权利。"他们进一步提出，"间接征收可能也会造成侵犯非合同权利。"
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
