|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：The Court's finding that Sláger's rights in the tender could be enforced under the Civil Code did not, however, entail a finding that such rights were proprietary. On the contrary, the Court proceeded on the basis that the plaintiff was entitled to declaratory relief that the terms of the GTT had not been complied with是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
The Court's finding that Sláger's rights in the tender could be enforced under the Civil Code did not, however, entail a finding that such rights were proprietary. On the contrary, the Court proceeded on the basis that the plaintiff was entitled to declaratory relief that the terms of the GTT had not been complied with
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
法院的结论，即Sláger的招标权可以根据民法强制执行没有，但是，带来一发现这样的权利是专有的。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
该法院的裁决的权利,sláger招标文件中可执行根据《民法》,但没有,需要有一个结论,即这种权利是专有的。 与此相反,法院的基础上进行的,原告有权宣告性补救的条款GTT没有得到遵守。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
发现的法院的Sláger的在招标可能被强制执行在民事规章之下，然而，不需要发现这样权利是私有的。 相反，法院进行了，根据原告有资格获得陈述安心GTT的期限未遵照。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
法院的调查结果所能执行 Sláger 的权利以投标方式，根据民法典 》 不，然而，需要一个这样的权利是专有的发现。与此相反，法院接着在原告有权不遵守的职权范围，全球工作队的确认式救济的基础上。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
