|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：But trade-offs involving natural capital are surely highly unlikely to be in the interests of society as a whole, particularly future generations, who may reasonably expect that the present generation should not leave the planet in a worse state than it received it – a key principle of sustainability. It could be argue是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
But trade-offs involving natural capital are surely highly unlikely to be in the interests of society as a whole, particularly future generations, who may reasonably expect that the present generation should not leave the planet in a worse state than it received it – a key principle of sustainability. It could be argue
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
null
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
但取舍涉及自然资本肯定是很难在社会整体的利益 , 特别是后代 , 谁可以合理地预期 , 目前的新一代不应离开地球的更糟糕的状态比它收到了它——一项可持续性原则。 它可以被认为是一种下降 , 自然资本可能会脱机设置增加生产的资本或知识产权资本未来的子孙后代将会从中受益。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
整体上，但介入自然资本的交易肯定是高度不太可能是有利于社会，特殊未来世代，也许合理地期望当前世代在一个更坏的状态比它接受了-能持续力的一项关键原则的它不应该把行星留在。 It could be argued that a decline in natural capital may be off-set by an increase in manufactured capital or intellectual capital from which future generations will benefit. Personally I am very skeptical of such a
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
但权衡取舍涉及自然资本肯定极不可能在社会利益作为整体，特别是未来的一代，他们可以合理地期待，现在的一代在较差的状态，比它接受了它 — — 可持续发展的一个关键原则，不应该离开这个星球。可以说，自然资本的跌幅可能会抵消增加生产性资本或智力资本从中未来几代人将会受益。个人而言，我很怀疑这种说法。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
