|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：Classic vs LAMP: The authors state that the classic PCR assay missed 4 BATV positive samples. A solitary assay should never be relied upon for confirmation; as the author’s state that isolations were made it should be simple to confirm with real-time or classic PCR and preferably sequence analysis.是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
Classic vs LAMP: The authors state that the classic PCR assay missed 4 BATV positive samples. A solitary assay should never be relied upon for confirmation; as the author’s state that isolations were made it should be simple to confirm with real-time or classic PCR and preferably sequence analysis.
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
null
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
经典vs灯:撰文人说经典的PCR含量不容错过4 BATV积极的样本。 单独的含量不应依赖确认;由于撰文人的状态,隔离了它应简单确认提供实时的或经典的PCR和最好的序列分析。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
经典之作对灯： 作者阐明，经典PCR分析用试样错过了4个BATV正面样品。 不应该为确认依靠一个孤零零分析用试样; 作为作者的阐明，隔离被做了它应该是简单的证实以实时或经典PCR和更好地序列分析。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
经典 vs 灯: 作者说明经典 pcr 错过 4 BATV 阳性样品。孤立性的测定永远不应依赖，但的确认;作为隔离了的作者的状态应该是简单的确认与实时或经典的 PCR 和最好是序列分析。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
