当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:in principle there is no objection to an increase in the terminal depth that the hole provides and the depth now is equivalent to that of the existing RCD sockets. However, the hole at the back of the terminal is of a smaller size to that of the terminal itself and this creates a ledge that the conductors can catch on.是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
in principle there is no objection to an increase in the terminal depth that the hole provides and the depth now is equivalent to that of the existing RCD sockets. However, the hole at the back of the terminal is of a smaller size to that of the terminal itself and this creates a ledge that the conductors can catch on.
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
null
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
正在翻译,请等待...
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
原则上没有反对在孔提供的终端深度的增量,并且深度现在与那是等效的现有的RCD插口。 然而,孔在终端的后面是更小的大小对那终端,并且这创造指挥可能风行的一个壁架。
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
原则上不反对增加孔提供终端深度并深度现在是相当于现有民盟的套接字。然而,在终端孔是终端本身的面积较小的这造成导线能赶上窗台。
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译,请等待...
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭