求翻译：這是因為孔子、墨子對於禮、樂都不以外在的形式為然，二子並非完全不相同。墨子對於禮、樂之革新其實是針對未符合孔子禮學真實意義之儒與小人儒的再一次哲學突破。是什么意思？

null

This is because 孔子, 墨子 for gift, we are not other than in the form of, second child is not fully are not the same. 墨子 for gift, instead of innovation is that do not meet 孔子 gift how real meaning of 儒 and 小人 儒 of again philosophy breakthrough.

This is because Kong Zi, Mozi regarding the ritual, Ledu are not so by the external form, two sub-completely is not by no means same.Mozi regarding the ritual, the happy innovation is actually aims at has not conformed to Confucian of and the villain Confucian the Kong Zi ritual study real significa

This is because Confucius and Mozi and LEDU not of external form, but, the second child is not completely the same. MO-ceremony, music of innovation is in fact did not comply with the true meaning of Kong Zili Confucianism and villain Confucian philosophical breakthrough once again.

null