求翻译：任何人写的历史都有几分真实性在其中。同样地，没有一部历史是绝对客观的，不管是胜利者写的还是失败者写的。所以，可不可信仅仅存在于个人的阅读之中，同样的事件也可以产生截然不同的解释和评价。归根到底，历史也只是掺杂了事实的观念的集合而已。是什么意思？

Anyone who has written some truth in the history of them. Similarly, history is not an absolute objective, whether the winner or loser write write. Therefore, can be trusted only in the individual being read, the same events can also produce very different interpretation and evaluation. In the final

History written by a person who is a measure of truth in them. Similarly, without a history is an absolute objective, whether it be winners or losers wrote wrote it. Therefore, without credible exist only in personal reading, just as the incident could also produce different interpretation and evalu

Anybody writes the history all has several minutes authenticity in among.Similarly, does not have a history is absolutely objective, no matter is the victor writes the loser to write.Therefore, is credible exists merely during individual reading, the similar event also may have the entirely differen

Anyone who wrote history has some truth in it. Similarly, without a history is entirely objective, whether it was written by the winner or the loser to write. So, not credible existed only in personal reading, the same events can also have a very different interpretation and evaluation. The final an

Anyone who has written some truth in the history of them. Similarly, history is not an absolute objective, whether the winner or loser write write. Therefore, can be trusted only in the individual being read, the same events can also produce very different interpretation and evaluation. In the final