当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:从比较中可以发现,无论是价格还是性能,都是FTTB+LAN占优。但是FTTB+LAN的覆盖范围只有100米,初期投资时需要设置大量楼道设备箱,当接入率较低时,FTTB+LAN的成本反而高于ADSL。再加上FTTB+LAN在老小区需要重新铺设线缆,因此目前国内的老旧小区宽带接入还是以ADSL为主。是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
从比较中可以发现,无论是价格还是性能,都是FTTB+LAN占优。但是FTTB+LAN的覆盖范围只有100米,初期投资时需要设置大量楼道设备箱,当接入率较低时,FTTB+LAN的成本反而高于ADSL。再加上FTTB+LAN在老小区需要重新铺设线缆,因此目前国内的老旧小区宽带接入还是以ADSL为主。
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
null
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
It can be found from the comparison, whether they are price and performance are FTTB + LAN predominate. But the coverage of FTTB + LAN only 100 meters, the initial investment needs to be set at a large hallway, when access to equipment boxes with a lower rate, when the cost instead FTTB + LAN ADSL h
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
May discover from the comparison, regardless of is the price or the performance, all is FTTB+LAN occupies superiorly.But FTTB+LAN cover scope when 100 meters, initial investment needs to establish the massive corridor equipment box, when turns on lowly rate, the FTTB+LAN cost instead is higher than
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
From the comparison can be found in both price and performance are the FTTB+LAN-dominated. But the coverage is only 100 meters of FTTB+LAN, the initial investment needs to be set when a large number of corridor equipment box, when the access rate is low, FTTB+LAN have higher costs than ADSL. Combine
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
null
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭