|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：Neither Glass-Steagall nor Mr Volcker's rule really comes close to solving the problem. Leveraging has to be eliminated entirely, from both banks and pseudo-banks. That means the Federal Reserve Act has to be changed and all financial institutions brought under one roof.directly. Unfortunately in this Glass was only pa是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
Neither Glass-Steagall nor Mr Volcker's rule really comes close to solving the problem. Leveraging has to be eliminated entirely, from both banks and pseudo-banks. That means the Federal Reserve Act has to be changed and all financial institutions brought under one roof.directly. Unfortunately in this Glass was only pa
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
沃尔克先生也不glass-steagall的规则其实是接近解决的问题。 利用已将完全消除,无论从银行和假冒银行。 这意味着联邦储备法案都要修改和所有金融机构带来了一个屋顶下.直接。 可惜在这玻璃是只取得部分成功。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
玻璃Steagall和Volcker先生的规则真正地不来紧挨解决问题。 支持必须从银行和冒充银行整个地被消灭。 那意味必须改变联邦储蓄会行动，并且所有财政机关被带来在一roof.directly以下。 不幸地在这块玻璃是只部份地成功的。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
格拉斯-既沃尔克先生的规则真的是接近于解决问题。利用已完全被淘汰，从银行和 pseudo-banks。这就意味着联邦储备法案必须是根据一个 roof.directly 提出的更改和所有金融机构。不幸的是在这种玻璃只是部分成功。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
