求翻译：总之，笔者认为，非法证据排除规则本身是科学的，富有人性的。错就错在，它太理想化，它对规则运作的司法环境要求太高，即使在美国这样一个法治十分昌明的国家，该规则都受到了诸多的诘难，就更不用奢谈它能在美国以外的国家确立而不受到批评了。是什么意思？

正在翻译，请等待...

In short, the author believes that illegal exclusionary rule itself is a scientific and humane. wrong is wrong, it is too idealistic, it operates on the rules of the environmental requirements are too high, even in the United States such a rule of 10 sub-chang-ming, have been subjected to the rules

In brief, the author believed that, illegal evidence elimination rule itself is scientific, rich human nature.Wrong wrong in, it too idealizes, it too is high to the rule operation judicial environment request, even if in the American this kind of government by law extremely prosperous country, this

正在翻译，请等待...

In short, I believe that the exclusionary rule itself is a scientific, humane. It would be wrong in that it is too idealistic, its rules of operation of the environmental requirements of justice is too high, even if the rule of law in the United States, a very flourishing state, the rules are subjec