求翻译：对于屈原及其作品的评论，尽管自汉代以来，就有少数人或对其思想人品稍有非议，然而都是在肯定屈原是一个真实的历史人物，但辛亥革命以后，则出现了否定屈原存在的真实性及其著作权的论点，又无端指责屈原的人品与思想，一些怪论也在不断出现。郭沫若和穆陶两位作家都是站在赞扬屈原的角度，肯定其历史地位，是坚决的颂扬派，都张扬屈原的爱国精神，无私品格和忠贞。但两位作家笔下的屈原形象又各有不同，本文主要从郭沫若《屈原》和穆陶《屈原》两部作品来分析两位作家笔下的屈原形象的不同是什么意思？

正在翻译，请等待...

正在翻译，请等待...

Regarding Qu Yuan and work commentary, although since the Han Dynasty, has had the small number of people or has the censure slightly to its thought moral behavior, however all is in affirmed Qu Yuan is a real historical personage, but after 1911 Revolution, then appears denied authentic and the cop

Comment of Qu Yuan and his works, although since the beginning of the Han dynasty, there are a handful of their ideological and moral quality slightly criticized, yet are in Qu Yuan's was a real historical figure, but after the revolution, there have been no argument for authenticity of Qu Yuan and

Comment of Qu Yuan and his works, although since the beginning of the Han dynasty, there are a handful of their ideological and moral quality slightly criticized, yet are in Qu Yuan's was a real historical figure, but after the revolution, there have been no argument for authenticity of Qu Yuan and