|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：Breaking with a precedent set in Griggs v. Duke Power Company, the Supreme Court said the employees (not the employer) had the burden of showing any disparity was caused by the employers disputed practice. Recall that in Griggs v. Duke Power Company the Supreme Court had defined what was meant by unfair discrimination;是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
Breaking with a precedent set in Griggs v. Duke Power Company, the Supreme Court said the employees (not the employer) had the burden of showing any disparity was caused by the employers disputed practice. Recall that in Griggs v. Duke Power Company the Supreme Court had defined what was meant by unfair discrimination;
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
打破格里格斯诉杜克电力公司开创了一个先例，最高法院说，员工（雇主）有任何的差距是由雇主有争议的做法引起的负担。回想一下格里格斯诉杜克电力公司，在最高法院已确定什么是不公平的歧视的意思，它也放在用人单位的举证责任，表明雇用问题的做法是与工作相关的，当它产生不利影响的一个受保护的成员类。后的格里格斯情况，证明你是非法歧视往往意味着只是统计显示，例如，职位分类是主要由白人举行，而第二个不太吸引人的分类主要由非白人举行。这项统计的情况下作出的，举证责任转移到用人单位，以证明其就业的做法担任一个必要的商业目的辩护，成为被称为业务需要防御。安装在这种情况下的自卫往往是如此昂贵，很多雇主没
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
