求翻译：但事实不是这样, 没有人能够以中立的态度来对待传统。如五四时期的胡适是激进反传统的, 严复和梁启超愈往后则维护传统的立场愈强烈。如果说在“进步与反动”两分法研究模式中, 中国近代思想家大都有个从进步到保守的变化,那么,三分模式的问题对于它所界定的属于自由主义者的思想家们,还需要重新用激进主义和保守主义来加以解读。这显然是不合理的。是什么意思？

But that is not the case, no one can a neutral attitude towards the traditional. Such as the May Fourth Movement, Hu Shi was the radical anti-traditional, Yan Fu and Liang Qichao the more the future is to maintain the traditional position more strongly. If progress and reaction "the dichotomy resear

But this is not the case, no one can be in a neutral attitude toward traditional. If the period 54 Hu Shih is radical anti-traditional, Yan Fu and Liang Qichao farther you go, preserving traditional position more strongly. If it is said that in the "progress" and the reactionary mode, two sub-study

But the fact is not this, nobody can treat the tradition by the neutral manner.If 54 time Hu Shi is the radical counter-tradition, will restore peace Liang Qichao to maintain traditional strictly the standpoint to be more intense in the future.If in “is progressive and is reactionary” in the method

But that is not the case, no one will take a neutral attitude to tradition. Wusi period of Hu Shi's radical tradition, Yan Fu and Liang Qi-chao and the more traditional position back more strongly. If it is said that "progressive and reactionary" dichotomy in the research mode, most of the thinkers

null