|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：One solution, which however is rather expensive because it may involve a deep excavation*, is to dig out a quantity of soil which weighs exactly as much as the dead*load of the building plus the quantity of live load which is likely to be on it. This depth of dig should be such as to make sure that the loaded building 是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
One solution, which however is rather expensive because it may involve a deep excavation*, is to dig out a quantity of soil which weighs exactly as much as the dead*load of the building plus the quantity of live load which is likely to be on it. This depth of dig should be such as to make sure that the loaded building
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
一个解决方案，这不过是相当昂贵的，因为它可能涉及深基坑开挖*，是挖出来的土壤数量，重量完全如建筑物的死*负载加活荷载量，这很可能是多它。这种挖深度应该是这样的，以确保装入的建设理论解决具有零。自地面将携带没有更多的负载后的结构已比前进行，将在理论上没有通用的解决。然而，事实上，由于种种原因，一些基础将下沉。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
一个解决方案,而不是很昂贵,因为这不过是一个深层挖掘,可能还要包括*,是挖掘土壤,它的重量完全相同的数量,但是死*加载的建筑加上数量的实时负载,可能。 该深度的挖掘应确保装入建筑理论解决为零。 由于地面将不得携带更多的结构后加载已张贴于之前进行,将从理论上讲是可以解决一般并无。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
挖出的土壤，它的重量到底多大的数量是解决办法之一，这不过是相当昂贵，因为它可能涉及深开挖 ＊，象死 ＊ 负荷的建设，加上这是可能会对它的活荷载的数量。这种%E
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
