|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：This Article takes issue with each of these positions and concludes that the judiciary has in effect abdicated its constitutional role. The granting of immunity to defense witnesses would not violate the constitutional powers of the Executive Branch, and Congress does not have the authority to dictate to the Judicial B是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
This Article takes issue with each of these positions and concludes that the judiciary has in effect abdicated its constitutional role. The granting of immunity to defense witnesses would not violate the constitutional powers of the Executive Branch, and Congress does not have the authority to dictate to the Judicial B
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
本文以每个职位的问题，并得出结论认为，司法机关已生效退位其宪法的作用。给予辩方证人免疫力，不会违反行政部门的宪制权力，国会没有权力支配司法部门它选择的法定计划。 1970年“免疫法”是违宪的权力下放给执行。的行为违反了三权分立，因为它妨碍司法的“宪法分配功能相当审理案件和controversies.t'我'，它这样做在两个相关的方面，第一，由政府授予后，酌情决定，利害关系人，行为不被允许职务的司法分支的权力和职责是否1免疫津贴是必要的。第二次否认法官迫使证词的防御以及检察机关的权力，，该行为可防止确保完整和准确的事实，寻找司法执行被告的宪法权利，提出了一种有效的防御。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
这一条,每个这些立场,并得出结论认为,
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
