求翻译：我国学者吴丁娥(1990)把克拉申“输入假设”的具体内容概括为:运用第二语言的流畅程度不是通过学习语言规则来达到的,而是在具有大量的,合适的输入语的环境中慢慢地形成的[2]。然而，Marton认为, 克拉申的理论是“反语言教育的”,称他忽略了教育质量这个至关重要的问题[3]。Yorio对克拉申的可理解的语言输入从而获得语言习得的论断提出了异议。他认为我们必须注意第二语言的学习环境和具体准确的学习目标。盲目的“沉浸”式语言教学，在培养学生“流利”的同时常常导致他们语言的僵化和不准确[4]。是什么意思？

正在翻译，请等待...

Oh, ah scholars (1990) The carat to the input hypothesis and the specific details for: Using the 2 language fluency in the language learning is not attained by the rule, but with a large number of the appropriate input, the language slowly in the environment of the form [ 2]. However, Accra Marton b

Chinese scholar Wu Dinge (1990) to krashen's "input assumption" specific content summarized as: using second smoothness of the language is not language rules to achieve through learning, but with a large number of, slowly forming in the appropriate input language environment [2]. However, Marton thi