求翻译：1875年的居里诉米沙案判例将其定义为："一方得到权利、利益、利润或好处，或者另一方抑制一定行为，承受损害，损失或责任。"[1]但需要补充的是，这两者都必须是对履行义务当事人的回报。此外，接受义务履行的当事人诚实地放弃了某项请求权(不论该请求是否能成功)也被视为有效的对价[2]。是什么意思？

正在翻译，请等待...

The curies 1875 complaints against M Sha case will set a precedent which it defines as: "a party given the right, interest, profits or benefits, or the other Party a certain behavior, damage, loss or liability. " [ 1] However, it should be added that, both must be involved in the performance of the

1875 curie sued the Mischa document legal precedent its definition is: A “side obtains the right, the benefit, the profit or the advantage, or another side suppression certain behavior, the withstanding harm, loses or the responsibility.But “(1) needs to supplement, this both all must be to fulfills

1875 case of Curie Misha case defined it as: "get right, interest, profit or benefit of a party or inhibition of certain acts of the other party, suffer damage, loss or liability. "[1] but to add is, both of which must be a return for performance of obligations of the parties. In addition, accept th

正在翻译，请等待...