当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:Huang(1986)认为,洛克的‘反省’过于注重经验,而斯宾诺莎的‘反思’过于注重物质世界而割裂了经验判断,理智离不开“经验论”和“唯理论”任何一方面。是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
Huang(1986)认为,洛克的‘反省’过于注重经验,而斯宾诺莎的‘反思’过于注重物质世界而割裂了经验判断,理智离不开“经验论”和“唯理论”任何一方面。
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:21:38
huang (1986) believes that Locke 'introspection' too much emphasis on experience, and Spinoza 'reflection' too much emphasis on the material world separates the experience of judgment, intellect can not be separated from the "empiricism" and "rationalism" any aspect of .
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:23:18
Huang (1986) believes that the Baroque, the 'reflection' is too focused on experience, and Spinoza's 'reflection' is too materialistic and fragmented world, and experience to determine the reason cannot be separated from the "experience" and "only" theory in any.
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:24:58
Huang(1986) believed that, Locker's `engages in introspection' too to pay great attention to the experience, on the one hand but Spinoza's `reconsidered' too to pay great attention to the material world to separate the experience judgment, the reason could not leave “the empiricism” and “the rationa
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
Huang (1986), Locke's ' reflection ' put too much emphasis on experience, and Spinoza's ' reflection ' has put too much emphasis on the physical world and fragmented experience judgment, reason cannot be separated from the "experience" and "rationalism" any one thing.
  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译,请等待...
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭