|
关注:1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译:我认为哈姆雷特不是简单的能用坏与不坏来界定的人。首先我们不能怀疑的是他是一个有孝心的人,他就算知道自己可能会失去生命也仍然要为父亲复仇。是什么意思?![]() ![]() 我认为哈姆雷特不是简单的能用坏与不坏来界定的人。首先我们不能怀疑的是他是一个有孝心的人,他就算知道自己可能会失去生命也仍然要为父亲复仇。
问题补充: |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
I think that Hamlet is not a simple as defined by the use of bad and not bad. First of all, we can not doubt that he is a filial piety, he even know he might have lost their lives still to be revenge for his father.
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
I am of the view that hamlet is not a simple to use and not bad to define. First of all, we cannot doubt that he was a young man of the heart, and he even knows that he could lose his life for his father is also still want to take revenge.
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
I thought Hamlet is not simple can wear out with the human who does not go bad limits.First our cannot suspect are he have the filial piety person, he knew oneself possibly could lose the life also still to have to take revenge for the father.
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
I don't think Hamlet is bad and not bad for simple to define people. First of all, we cannot doubt that he is a person of filial piety, he even knew that he could lose his life still for his revenge.
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译,请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区