求翻译：总体而言，民主主导援引面板都不符合被提到的先例，在发表意见的 50%。应该指出的是这些决定由民主党主导的事务委员会发表意见的自由党和保守党方向先例之间的差异并不有统计学意义。但就它自己的方式，有趣。这是唯一交叉表的符合自由党和保守党方向先例区别不统计学意义的表 2 中。民主党主导的援引面板是达到自由方向结果时援引一个保守方向的先例 (45.8%)，以达到符合标准的自由党方向结果 (43.3%) 的可能性。是什么意思？

正在翻译，请等待...

In general, citing democratic-led panel is not in conformity with the precedent has been referred to in the 50% comment. It should be noted that these decisions by the democratic-led the Committee's views on the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party of the direction of differences between precede

正在翻译，请等待...

Overall, Democratic-led quoted the Panel do not match the reference to precedents, comment in 50%. It should be pointed out that the decision by the Democratic Party-led Panel published opinions of the Liberal Party and the Conservative Party of precedent is not a statistically significant differenc

正在翻译，请等待...