|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：It seems like many consider Quora to be an objective source of information but popularity (wisdom of the crowd) doesn't ensure that a popular answer is the most accurate. The fact that the names of the answerers (& their professional connections) along with the names of the voters means there will always be a bias.是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
It seems like many consider Quora to be an objective source of information but popularity (wisdom of the crowd) doesn't ensure that a popular answer is the most accurate. The fact that the names of the answerers (& their professional connections) along with the names of the voters means there will always be a bias.
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
它似乎像许多人认为Quora的是一个客观的信息，但普及群众的智慧来源，并不能保证一个流行的答案是最准确的。将永远是事实，答复者的姓名以及与选民的名称（与他们的专业连接）是指有偏见。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
它看起来像许多人认为这是一个客观的信息来源 Quora 但普及 (智慧的人群） 并不确保一个流行的答案是最准确。这一事实另外 (科技及其专业连接） 沿与选民手段存在的名称的名称永远是一种偏见。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
