|
关注:1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译:ome scholars claim that knowledge only resides within (and between) the minds of individuals (i.e., Sveiby 1997). They often use the term tacit knowledge to capture this notion. In their view, once knowledge has been explicitly captured (i.e., documented), it is merely information. Nonaka and Takeuchi do not equate the是什么意思? 待解决
悬赏分:1
- 离问题结束还有
ome scholars claim that knowledge only resides within (and between) the minds of individuals (i.e., Sveiby 1997). They often use the term tacit knowledge to capture this notion. In their view, once knowledge has been explicitly captured (i.e., documented), it is merely information. Nonaka and Takeuchi do not equate the
问题补充: |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
青梅学者声称,知识只驻留内(之间)的个人(即sveiby 1997)头脑。他们经常使用的长期隐性知识捕捉到这一概念。在他们看来,一旦知识已明确捕获(即记录),它仅仅是信息。 Nonaka和Takeuchi不等同与知识之间的区别与知识,明确记载个人的头脑中的隐性和显性知识之间的区别,也不局限于长期的知识指的是前者。相反,他们看到的知识隐性知识是尚未完全阐明,系统化,在个人的头脑 - 如观念,展示,经验和累积的智慧 - 和,因此,很难明确记载。在这个意义上说,隐性和显性知识可以被看作是不等连续更多或更少默契(或或多或少明确)。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
欧米茄在只在学者们对知识(以及)的一些人(即sveiby1997)。 他们经常使用的长期隐性知识,捕捉这一概念。 他们认为,一旦知识已明确被拍到(即记录),它仅仅是信息。
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
青梅学
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区