|
关注:1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译:in order to talk about the nature of the universe and to discuss questions such as whether it has a beginning or an end, you have to be clear about what a scientific theory is. i shall take the simple-minded view that a theory is just a model of the universe, or a restricted part of it, and a set of rules that relate quantities in the model to observations that we make. it exists only in our minds and does not have any other reality. a theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements. it must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations. for example, aristotle’s theory that everything was made out of four elements, earth, air, fire, and water, was simple enough to qualify, but it did not make any definite predictions. on the other hand, newton’s theory of gravity was based on an even simpler model, in which bodies attracted each other with a force that was proportional to a quantity called their mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. yet it predicts the motion of the sun, the moon, and the planets to a high degree of accuracy.是什么意思? 待解决
悬赏分:1
- 离问题结束还有
in order to talk about the nature of the universe and to discuss questions such as whether it has a beginning or an end, you have to be clear about what a scientific theory is. i shall take the simple-minded view that a theory is just a model of the universe, or a restricted part of it, and a set of rules that relate quantities in the model to observations that we make. it exists only in our minds and does not have any other reality. a theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements. it must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations. for example, aristotle’s theory that everything was made out of four elements, earth, air, fire, and water, was simple enough to qualify, but it did not make any definite predictions. on the other hand, newton’s theory of gravity was based on an even simpler model, in which bodies attracted each other with a force that was proportional to a quantity called their mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. yet it predicts the motion of the sun, the moon, and the planets to a high degree of accuracy.
问题补充: |
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
在谈论性质的讨论问题,例如它是否已开始 or 结束的宇宙 and order,你要清楚地了解什么科学的理论是。我应当采取一种理论是宇宙,or 的 and 的意见,我们使涉及数量模型中的规则集,它的受限制部分的模型的头脑简单视图。它只存在于我们的头脑 and 并没有任何其他的现实。理论是一个很好的理论,如果它满足两个要求。它必须准确描述观测模型包含仅任意元素,它必须明确对作出预测,未来的观测结果的 and 的基础上一大类。例如,那里一切都出的四个元素、 地球、 空气、 消防、 and 水的亚里士多德的理论太简单了,符合条件,但它不做任何明确的预测。另一方面,牛顿的引力理论基于更简单的模型,其中机构吸引对方是叫他们大规模 and 它们之间的距离的平方成反比的数量成正比的力。尚未预测的太阳,月亮,and 运动精度高程度的行星。
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区