当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:I felt that the chemistry between performers was very good, and was one thing that kept me interested. I came to care for all three of them, and they worked well together. Fraser and Hutcherson in particular worked well as uncle and nephew. While I was disappointed in the narrow scope of the film's vision, what was contained within said scope was well done and entertaining. The 3D really made it better. Without the 3D, this film is nothing but a mere C-class fantasy adventure that will bore anyone above age 10. However, the chemistry of the actors and the 3D save it from somewhat disaster, and make the film a bit enjoyable. It's worth the price of admission to a 3D theater, for sure, but I advise you to bring a younger person with you (who knows, maybe you'll feed off their energy). To put it simple, every kid under 10 or 11 will love it, then watch it again in 10 years and go, "what was I thinking?". The reviewers of "Journey" are probably all correct: the logic is spotty, the premise is silly, and the requirement of the audience to suspend disbelief is beyond a typically successful film. However, despite all of that, I liked it! I went to see it because in my small town the offerings are rather slim, and I had seen everything else (is it me, or did this summer's films seem a bit clichéd and lame?).是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
I felt that the chemistry between performers was very good, and was one thing that kept me interested. I came to care for all three of them, and they worked well together. Fraser and Hutcherson in particular worked well as uncle and nephew. While I was disappointed in the narrow scope of the film's vision, what was contained within said scope was well done and entertaining. The 3D really made it better. Without the 3D, this film is nothing but a mere C-class fantasy adventure that will bore anyone above age 10. However, the chemistry of the actors and the 3D save it from somewhat disaster, and make the film a bit enjoyable. It's worth the price of admission to a 3D theater, for sure, but I advise you to bring a younger person with you (who knows, maybe you'll feed off their energy). To put it simple, every kid under 10 or 11 will love it, then watch it again in 10 years and go, "what was I thinking?". The reviewers of "Journey" are probably all correct: the logic is spotty, the premise is silly, and the requirement of the audience to suspend disbelief is beyond a typically successful film. However, despite all of that, I liked it! I went to see it because in my small town the offerings are rather slim, and I had seen everything else (is it me, or did this summer's films seem a bit clichéd and lame?).
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
我觉得演员之间化学是很好,一件事,让我感兴趣。我来照顾他们,所有三个和他们合作良好。弗雷泽和 Hutcherson 特别工作以及叔叔和侄子。失望的时候电影,什么视觉的包含在上述范围内的狭窄范围是视觉的很好的完成和娱乐。3D 真的做更好。没有 3D,这部电影只是仅仅是将孔 10 岁以上的人的 C 类幻想冒险。不过,演员和 3D 化学有点灾难,从保存它,使这部电影有点令人愉快。它这个价钱是值得 3D 剧场,入住的肯定,但我劝你,使你年轻的人 (谁知道呢,也许可以让吃掉他们的能量)。若要说得简单,每个孩子下 10 或 11 将爱它,然后看它再次在 10 年和转,"我想些什么?"。"之旅"审阅者可能是所有正确的: 逻辑是参差不齐,前提是愚蠢的和观众姑且要求超出通常成功的电影。然而,尽管所有这一切,我喜欢它 !我去看了,因为在我的小镇产品会大打折扣,和我见过一切 (是我,或今年夏天的电影没有一位 clichéd 和跛脚?)。
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭