|
关注：1
2013-05-23 12:21
求翻译：We have looked at the issue and the screw is not designed to go into a pre tapped hole, there is likely to be greater interference than a machine screw as the taptite is designed to roll its own thread, this is why the thread are blunter in your comparison. There is also a higher risk of cross threading是什么意思？ 待解决
 悬赏分：1
- 离问题结束还有
We have looked at the issue and the screw is not designed to go into a pre tapped hole, there is likely to be greater interference than a machine screw as the taptite is designed to roll its own thread, this is why the thread are blunter in your comparison. There is also a higher risk of cross threading
问题补充： |
|
2013-05-23 12:21:38
正在翻译，请等待...
|
|
2013-05-23 12:23:18
我们已研究过这个问题,同时,螺杆设计不转到前一个螺纹孔,在这种情况下,可能比一个更多干预的机器螺钉自攻螺钉是旨在聚集自己的线程,这就是为什么该线程是在比较变钝。 还有一个更高的风险的跨线程
|
|
2013-05-23 12:24:58
我们看问题，并且螺丝比机器螺丝没有被设计进入前开发孔，那里可能是更加巨大的干涉，当taptite被设计滚动它自己的螺纹，这就是为什么螺纹是直言在您的比较。 也有发怒穿线的更高的风险
|
|
2013-05-23 12:26:38
我们看过这一问题和螺丝不为了走进前拍了拍孔，还有可能是更大的干预比机器螺丝机械设计是滚它自己的线程，这就是为什么该线程是在你比较钝。此外，还有跨线程的风险较高
|
|
2013-05-23 12:28:18
正在翻译，请等待...
|
湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区
