当前位置:首页 » 翻译 
  • 匿名
关注:1 2013-05-23 12:21

求翻译:In order to talk about the nature of the universe and to discuss questions such as whether it has a beginning or an end, you have to be clear about what a scientific theory is. I shall take the simple-minded view that a theory is just a model of the universe, or a restricted part of it, and a set of rules that relate quantities in the model to observations that we make. It exists only in our minds and does not have any other reality. A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements. It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations. For example, Aristotle’s theory that everything was made out of four elements, earth, air, fire, and water, was simple enough to qualify, but it did not make any definite predictions. On the other hand, Newton’s theory of gravity was based on an even simpler model, in which bodies attracted each other with a force that was proportional to a quantity called their mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Yet it predicts the motion of the sun, the moon, and the planets to a high degree of accuracy.是什么意思?

待解决 悬赏分:1 - 离问题结束还有
In order to talk about the nature of the universe and to discuss questions such as whether it has a beginning or an end, you have to be clear about what a scientific theory is. I shall take the simple-minded view that a theory is just a model of the universe, or a restricted part of it, and a set of rules that relate quantities in the model to observations that we make. It exists only in our minds and does not have any other reality. A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements. It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations. For example, Aristotle’s theory that everything was made out of four elements, earth, air, fire, and water, was simple enough to qualify, but it did not make any definite predictions. On the other hand, Newton’s theory of gravity was based on an even simpler model, in which bodies attracted each other with a force that was proportional to a quantity called their mass and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. Yet it predicts the motion of the sun, the moon, and the planets to a high degree of accuracy.
问题补充:

  • 匿名
2013-05-23 12:26:38
谈论宇宙的本质,和讨论问题,例如是否有开头或结尾,你要清楚地了解什么科学的理论是。我应当采取一种理论是只是一个模型的宇宙或受限制的部分及一套规则,我们提出的意见涉及数量模型中的头脑简单视图。它只存在于我们的头脑,并没有任何其他的现实。理论是一个很好的理论,如果它满足两个要求。它必须准确描述意见包含仅任意元素,模型的基础上一大类,它必须明确对作出预测,未来的观测结果。例如,亚里斯多德的理论,而一切都是出的四个元素、 地球、 空气、 火灾和水,太简单了,符合条件,但它不做任何明确的预测。另一方面,牛顿的引力理论基于更简单的模型,其中机构吸引对方以被称为他们的质量的数量成正比和它们之间的距离的平方成反比的力量。然而它预测太阳、 月亮和高度的准确性,行星的运动。
 
 
网站首页

湖北省互联网违法和不良信息举报平台 | 网上有害信息举报专区 | 电信诈骗举报专区 | 涉历史虚无主义有害信息举报专区 | 涉企侵权举报专区

 
关 闭